GETTING
INFORMATION FROM PRESTON PARISH COUNCIL.
Written
for the Blog by a Preston resident.
Getting any sort of information from
Preston Parish Council is in itself a task you have to be prepared for, there
is no willingness by the council to part with any kind of information. It’s
almost as though the information belongs exclusively to the council and others
whoever they may be have no right to see it.
This is always the case no matter what
information you request, however innocuous. I am posting this as an example of
the difficulties experienced, when the information finally arrives probably
after a couple of months, and having had to fight to get it you’re simply
unable to figure out what all the fuss was about in the first place.
A typical request is that made on the 10th
December 2012 for two pieces of information, very simple to satisfy. There was
no acknowledgement of my request so I really didn’t know if it had been
received, a previous email requesting information was never received by the
council, apparently. So I waited for a month until the deadline for responding
had expired, I then contacted the council (08/01/13) to remind them and ask for
a Refusal Notice with detailed reasons for refusal if that was their intention
and if so I requested they review that decision, as required under FoIA.
The request originated in December 2011 at
the councils office in respect to planning applications for a New Community
Hall, at that time I was informed by the council that these documents did not
exist, there were no minutes for the approval of the applications or their
relevant expenditures.
Over the last two years I have written to
the council a number of times asking why there are no minutes relating to these
items and, if there are no minutes they cannot have been approved by council so
in who’s front room were these matters decided. Also, councillors who make such
illegal decisions and commit to financial expenditure outside of council may be
personally responsible for that cost. The council have even advised me to make
a complaint to the Audit Commission (I have that in writing from the Chairman
of the Parish Council) fully aware that the information requested did exist and
could have resulted in a possible audit Cost of approximately £9,000 to the
residents of Preston had I complained to the District Auditor. I would defy
anyone to not get frustrated by this type of behaviour and mismanagement!!
Residents of Preston have already suffered
a financial loss of almost £9,000 (March 2011) because the council advised a
resident to complain to the Audit Commission just to avoid talking to him. That
money came out of the pockets of residents who work hard to keep their homes
and families, effectively the council then waste that money, giving it to an
auditor who has charged them over £600 per hour when a lot of
families in the village do not have that as a weekly income.
Under Section 151 of the Local Government
Act 1972 the council must employ a ‘Responsible Financial Officer’, this person
deals with council auditing year in and year out and deals with the Audit
Commission and external auditors every year. He must be aware of the costs to
the council following such an Audit. Now we find the council is obviously
prepared and seemingly happy to needlessly spend yet another £9,000 in order
not to speak to me!
Who would end up paying for that?........
Preston Residents of course! Somebody needs get to the bottom of it before we
end up bankrupt.
It’s as though the council is purposefully
making life as difficult as possible to discourage anyone from asking anything
or requesting any information. I do know a number of people who in the past
have said to me ‘you won’t get anywhere
with them its not worth bothering with’. So many people just drop it and
walk away which encourages the council to follow that successful policy even
more!
To make it more difficult for me to request
information the council has banned me from making requests by email that would
certainly make getting information much more difficult because I am also banned
from talking to any of them, by a resolution of the council. Consequently some
neighbours who are councillors no longer visit or speak to us, I think that
amounts to intimidation by the council towards a single resident and the
council is intentionally attempting to isolate a household within their
community because the occupants challenge the council.
As soon as I found out about the complaint
to the Audit Commission and that there was to be an Audit I wrote to a
councillor to give my estimate of the, as yet unknown costs and number of man
hours I would expect such an audit on this size council to take.
Reproduced
below is my letter to the councillor.
Cllr. **************
******
***************
Preston
East Yorkshire
HU12 ***
11/03/2011
Dear Cllr. *******
Re: Audit
Commission.
Mr. ******* has recently informed me that
he has lodged a complaint with the Audit Commission relating to Preston Parish
Council.
Although I was aware that he wished to
submit such a complaint I have always and consistently advised against such
action over a period of several months, my preference has always been to
resolve any issue at the forthcoming elections. I view the action as very
serious and the potential cost implications to the parish may have far reaching
consequences.
I do not think Mr. ******* has fully
thought through his actions or the potential consequences of those actions.
Since being told I have had contact with the Audit Commission and whom I
believe the appointed auditor to be, Ms. Jackie Bellards’ office.
I have spoken to Mr. ******* and, on the
strength of the limited information that I possess to date, I have taken
certain actions of my own, and these are;
1.
I have withdrawn from any
election activity that Mr. ******* is involved with.
2.
I have instructed that my name
be removed from any leaflets or publications connected to any election
activity.
3.
I have withdrawn any support,
involvement or advice I may have been prepared to give to Mr. ******* activities.
I cannot in all good conscience align
myself with any activity that may directly result in damage to the parish, my
aim has always been to highlight shortcomings within the council, not cause
unnecessary cost to parish funds.
I understand and am familiar with the level
of fees chargeable for various levels of public audit staff. The District
Auditor will be the person to carry out any Audit as the Commission has
appointed her and her agreed maximum hourly rate is £325. Other staff members
have a much lower hourly rate but the rates are still substantial. There is
also the additional 20% VAT to be added to any fees charged, it may well be a
very costly exercise and damaging to the village.
I am aware that Audit durations for larger
and unitary councils may well last between 11 and 40 days, in the case of a
parish council such as Preston I would imagine an Audit duration of between 2
and 4 days depending on how organized the paperwork is. The cost and scope of
such an Audit is normally agreed between the Auditor and Council to be audited
prior to the work taking place.
I have to-day (13/03/11) met with and
advised friends and neighbours who may be standing as nominees (and associated
with Mr. *******) of this situation in order that they might be prepared for
any repercussions as a result of Mr. ******* actions, other than that I have no
further involvement.
I must ask that the council assure
confidentiality of this correspondence and no part of it be placed in the
public domain.
Kind Regards
*** *****
My
request for Information, 10/12/12
Preston Parish Council
**************
Preston
HU12 ***
10/12/12
Dear council
Request for information
under FoIA.
I would be grateful if you would forward copies of the council minutes
relating to the resolutions that authorised the following,
1.
Approval for submission of Planning Application No.
06/09312/PLF and 10/00410/PCC
2.
Approval for financial expenditure relating to the
above applications.
Yours sincerely
*** *****
My reminder to the council,
08/01/13
Preston Parish Council
**************
Preston
HU12 ***
08/01/13
Dear council
Re. FoIA request submitted
to you on 10/12/12.
To-date I have not had an acknowledgement or response to the above
request, I believe the 20 working day limit for response has now passed.
From your lack of response I can only assume you do not intend to respond
to the request, if this is the case would you please confirm that position by
return.
When you confirm that to be the case would you please include a refusal
certificate detailing the reasons you do not wish to disclose the requested
information and, take this as a request for the council to review its decision
as required under the above legislation.
Yours sincerely
*** *****
cant believe they did that, if they did they want sacking.
ReplyDeleteSteve
Hedon
Yes they did and we have the written evidence, unfortunately you can't sack them, I'll put a more detailed answer on the blog.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment
For a council to behave in this way is astonishing, you get my vote for sheer persistence, keep it up.
ReplyDeleteTommy
Preston