Reply
to comment, Carol Osgerby.
Written
for the Blog by a Preston resident.
Hi Carol
Thanks for your comment and my apologies
for any delay in responding. Forgive me if I’m mistaken but I seem to recall
you attending the Preston Community Hall AGM in early 2011, if I’m correct you
may recall a number of residents requesting representation on the charity as
trustees. The Chairman of the trustees promised they would make enquiries into
that issue and get back to us, they never did. I also seem to recall you
offered your good services and advice as you are or were involved with
charities in some form or other, as I recall they never accepted that offer.
Charities I’m afraid is about my worst
subject, not that any of them are particularly good. One of my main sources of
information on the subject is the Charities Commission website and as a
layperson I tend to accept that as authoritative.
I do agree that the trustees are required
by law to put the interests of the charity first and foremost and I do consider
it creates a conflict with their role as councillors. Although that situation
may not be ideal it is entirely permissible and therefore we have to work
within those issues.
I do not consider it honest for the council
to blame some legal restriction as a reason for not being able to update
residents at any time. During public participation the council is out of
session and members could therefore update us as trustees and not councillors.
You say The Community Hall Charity does
have resident trustees in responsible positions, I certainly wasn’t aware of
that although I do know residents form part of the Community Hall management
committee, and indeed I believe a resident is Chairman of that committee.
Could I ask how you consider your understanding fits in with
or opposes the posting you responded to?
Our intention is certainly not to create
additional difficulties it is simply to understand the various positions and
have better communication between trustees and residents. What I find most
disappointing is that lack of information and communication between the two, I
would have thought, possibly mistakenly, that a good starting point would be to
contact the trustees to seek clarification, unfortunately they never respond.
With this being our weakest subject any
information or advice you are able to give would be very welcome indeed and
most valued.
Again thanks for taking the time to read
our blog and for your comment.
Yes, I was at the 2011 AGM, and yes, I did offer support. I attended several Community Hall committee meetings and did some work for them producing a redraft of the constitution which I felt would put them on a stronger footing. I also discovered a very complex situation regarding the lease of the hall, which appears to be vested in the Parish Council, and not the charity. They did not take my advice, and I have attended no further meetings.
ReplyDeleteWhat exactly would you like to know? And when you say "our" - who are you referring to?
Thanks for your comment Carol, I have answered it on the main page.
ReplyDelete